The development of recording media, different
from representative media in kind as well as degree, was as significant
historically as the invention of writing seven thousand years earlier.
Photography, film and sound recording taken together shifted dramatically our
historical perspective.
The representation arts made possible the
re-creation of phenomena, but they required the complex application of the
codes and conventions of languages. Moreover, those languages were manipulated
by individuals and therefore the element of choice was and is highly
significant in the representational arts. This element is the source of most of
the aesthetics of the pictorial and literary arts. What interests aestheticians
is not what is said but how it is said.
In stark contrast, the recording arts provide
a much more direct line of communication between the subject and the observer.
They do have their own codes and conventions, it’s true: a film or sound
recording is not reality after all. But the language of the recording media is
both more direct and less ambiguous than either written or pictorial language. In
addition, the history of the recording arts has, until recently, been a direct
progression toward greater verisimilitude (representation of reality). Colour
film reproduces more of reality than does black and white; sound film is more
closely parallel to actual experience than is silent; and so forth.
This qualitative difference between
representational media and recording media is very clear to those who use the
latter for scientific purposes. Anthropologists, for example are well aware of
the advantages of film over the written word.
Film does not completely eliminate the
intervention of a third party between the subject and the observer, but it does
significantly reduce the distortion that the presence of an artist inevitably
introduces. That is, until now. The application of digital technology to film
and audio, which began to gather momentum in the late 1980s, points to a new
level of discourse: one that is now revolutionizing our attitude toward the
recording arts. Simply put, digital techniques like morphing and sampling
destroy our faith in the honesty of the images and sounds we see and hear. The
verisimilitude is still there – but we can no longer trust our eyes and ears.
No comments:
Post a Comment